Skip to main content
. 2022 May 21;22:143. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02559-1

Table 1.

Comparison of microscopic, end-point PCR, RT-PCR, and β-D-glucan assays between PCP-patients and negative controls

Patients with suspected PCP P. jirovecii detection by:
Methenamine-silver staining microscopy Unyvero-HPN end-point PCRa Sacace-P. jirovecii Real-TM PCR (Ct)b β-D-glucan assay (pg/mL)c
1  +   +  +  +   + (20) 621
2 - -  + (28)  > 1000
3  +   +  +  +   + (21) 879
4  +   +  +  +   + (21) 960
5  +   +  +  +   + (22)  > 1000
6 - - -  > 1000
7 - - -  > 1000
8 - - -  > 1000
9 - - -  > 1000
10  +   +  +  +   + (26)  > 1000
11  +   +  +  +   + (24)  > 1000
12 - - -  > 1000
13  +   +  +  +   + (18) 591
14 -  +   + (30) 118
15 - - -  > 1000
16 - - - 837
17  +   +  +  +   + (19) 255
18  +   +  +  +   + (19)  < 10
Total 9 (50%) 10 (55.6%) 11 (61.0%) 15 (83.3%)
Negative control patients
 19 - - - 309
 20 - - -  < 10
 21 - - - 115
 22 - - -  < 10

a + weakly, +  + moderately, +  +  + intensely positive samples

b(Ct) stands for threshold cycle value

cResults were < 400 pg/mL = negative; 400–450 pg/mL = indeterminate; > 450 pg/mL = positive