Table 5.
Sensitivity analysis of further adjusting dietary confounding factors on the basis of the general confounders
| Quartiles of energy-adjusted carotenoid intakes (OR, 95% CI) | Ptrend a | Per one-SD increase b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | |||
| Total carotenoids | 1.0 | 0.47 (0.25, 0.87)* | 0.44 (0.22, 0.87)* | 0.23 (0.12, 0.46)** | < 0.001 | 0.60 (0.47, 0.77)** |
| α-carotene | 1.0 | 0.76 (0.42, 1.38) | 0.75 (0.40, 1.40) | 0.66 (0.35, 1.26) | 0.24 | 0.94 (0.78, 1.14) |
| β-carotene | 1.0 | 0.59 (0.32, 1.08) | 0.36 (0.19, 0.68)* | 0.24 (0.12, 0.49)** | < 0.001 | 0.68 (0.55, 0.86)* |
| β-cryptoxanthin | 1.0 | 1.11 (0.62, 2.01) | 0.82 (0.42, 1.58) | 0.54 (0.29, 0.99)* | 0.02 | 0.77 (0.60, 0.99)* |
| Lycopene | 1.0 | 0.73 (0.40, 1.33) | 0.68 (0.36, 1.29) | 0.55 (0.29, 1.04) | 0.09 | 0.74 (0.58, 0.93)* |
| Lut-zea | 1.0 | 0.51 (0.26, 0.97)* | 0.40 (0.20, 0.80)* | 0.25 (0.12, 0.51)** | < 0.001 | 0.64 (0.50, 0.83)* |
a Tested by entering the median intake of each quartile of carotenoids as a continuous variable into univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. b Performed by standardising the energy-adjusted carotenoid intakes data and entering it into the model.
Adjustment for age (years), gestational age (weeks), pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2), gravidity, parity, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) status (yes/no), family hypertension history (yes/no), physical activity (MET [h/d]), education and income levels, total energy intake (kcal/d) and dietary factors (energy-adjusted dietary vegetables/ fruits/ fat/ fiber/ vitamin D/ vitamin C/ vitamin E/ flavonoids intake)
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.001.