Skip to main content
. 2022 May 14;2022:7306198. doi: 10.1155/2022/7306198

Table 3.

Proportional hazard regression model for OS and DSS of MIBC patients by treatment information: RC vs. TMT.

Characteristics No. of patients Overall survival (OS) Disease-specific survival (DSS)
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
RC-MIBC cohort 891 1.00 [reference] 1.00 [reference]
TMT-MIBC cohort 891 1.17 0.91-1.43 1.20 0.97-1.49
 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
  Yes 36 1.10 0.51-2.03 1.08 0.45-2.14
  No 855 1.18 0.90-1.48 1.19 0.86-1.53
 Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC)
  Yes 515 1.08 0.88-1.47 1.09 0.86-1.50
  No 376 1.21 0.77-1.69 1.23 0.74-1.71
 Radiation dose
  <60 Gy 467 1.24 0.83-1.61 1.25 0.81-1.64
  ≥60 Gy 424 1.06 0.79-1.43 1.09 0.77-1.45
 Response to chemoradiation
  Complete 642 0.99 0.72-1.32 1.00 0.73-1.50
  Incomplete 249 1.34 0.68-1.71 1.36 0.64-1.80

Analyses were based on the Cox PH regression. All baseline covariates were well balanced in the propensity score-matched sample. Therefore, only treatment information was controlled for in the final Cox PH regression model. OS: overall survival; DSS: disease-specific survival; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; CI: confidence interval; RC: radical cystectomy; TMT: bladder-sparing trimodality therapy; MIBC: muscle-invasive bladder cancer.