Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;9(6):ofac112. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac112

Table 2.

Performance Characteristics of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tests for Candidemia as Compared With Culture as the Imperfect Reference Standard

Prevalence Corresponding Patient Populations Beta-D-Glucan (60%/80%)
Beta-D-Glucan (80%/80%) PCR, T2Candida (70%/90%)
PCR, T2Candida (90%/90%)
PPV, % NPV, % PPV, % NPV, % PPV, % NPV, % PPV, % NPV, %
~0.4% Any patient for whom a blood culture is collected 1 99.8 1 99.9 3 99.8
3 >99.9
~1% Patient in ICU with fever 3 99.5 4 99.7 7 99.7 8 99.9
~3% Patients with sepsis, septic shock, in ICU for >3–7 d
8.5 98.5 11 99.2 18 99 22 99.6
~10% ICU patient at increased risk for candidemia based on clinical prediction score
25 94.7 31 97 44 96 50 98.8

Table 2 adapted from Clancy and Nguyen [34]. BDG sensitivity/specificity for diagnosing candidemia are taken from meta-analyses cited in the text. PCR and T2Candida sensitivity/specificity for diagnosing candidemia are taken from a meta-analysis and DIRECT and DIRECT2 clinical trials [40, 42, 43]. In order to make rational use of culture-independent diagnostic tests, clinicians must be familiar with test performance and prevalence of various types of invasive candidiasis locally.

Culture-independent diagnostic test–guided patient management strategies have not been validated in clinical trials. We propose that patient populations with PPV >15% might be targeted for such trials to better identify the clinical benefit of response to antifungal therapy. These “false positives” among high-risk patient populations may represent deep-seated invasive candidiasis that is negative by blood and other cultures.

Abbreviations: BDG: 1,3-beta-D-glucan; ICU, intensive care unit; NPV, negative predictive value; PCR, Candida polymerase chain reaction; PPV, positive predictive value.