Skip to main content
. 2022 May 23;22:394. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03463-y

Table 3.

Assessment of the endodontic e-learning application on the SUS (test groups 1 and 2; n = 84 students)

Item 5 4 3 2 1
I can imagine using the learning application regularly 38.1% (32) 44.0% (37) 8.3% (7) 7.1% (6) 1.2% (1)
The learning application is unnecessarily complex 0% (0) 1.2% (1) 10.7% (9) 40.5% (34) 46.4% (39)
The learning application is easy to use 44.0% (37) 38.1% (32) 11.9% (10) 4.8% (4) 0% (0)
I would need technical support to use the learning application 0% (0) 3.6% (3) 15.5% (13) 25.0% (21) 54.8% (46)
The different functions of the learning application are well-integrated 32.1% (27) 47.6% (40) 19.0% (16) 0% (0) 0% (0)
The learning application contains many inconsistencies 0% (0) 2.4% (2) 15.5% (13) 52.4% (44) 28.6% (24)
The learning application is quick to master 56.0% (47) 25.0% (21) 15.5% (13) 2.4% (2) 0% (0)
The operation is very cumbersome 0% (0) 1.2% (1) 8.3% (7) 28.6% (24) 60.7% (51)
I felt very confident using the learning application 41.7% (35) 38.1% (32) 16.7% (14) 2.4% (2) 0% (0)
I had to learn many things before I could work with the learning application 0% (0) 3.6% (3) 15.5 (13) 29.8% (25) 50.0%(42)

5 = applies strongly, 4 = applies predominantly, 3 = undecided, 2 = does not apply predominantly, 1 = does not apply