Skip to main content
. 2022 May 9;9:888360. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.888360

TABLE 1.

Polyphenol content (mg GAE/100 g dw) in aqueous and ethanolic extracts of the studied tunicates and sea cucumbers.

Polyphenol content (mg GAE/100 g dw)
Extract
Species Aqueous
(n = 3)
Ethanolic
(n = 3)
Styela plicata 31 ± 6aA 40 ± 7bA
Aplidium sp. 260 ± 13dA 365 ± 21dB
Botrylloides diegensis 428 ± 10eA 669 ± 11eB
Ciona robusta 103 ± 8cA 206 ± 14cB
H. (Roweothuria) arguinensis 84 ± 4bcA 9 ± 5abB
H. (Holothuria) mammata 79 ± 1bA 21 ± 17abB
H. (Panningothuria) forskali 48 ± 2aA ndaB

Values are presented as average ± standard deviation. For all groups, n = 3. Nd, not detected. Different lowercase letters within a column correspond to statistical differences (p < 0.05) between different species and same extract type (ethanolic or aqueous, respectively). Different uppercase letters within a row correspond to statistical differences (p < 0.05) between aqueous and ethanolic extracts from the same species.