Skip to main content
. 2022 May 23;22:156. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01682-w

Table 2.

Evaluation of postoperative pain status and adverse reactions

Group RAN n = 406 (41.86%) RAY n = 564 (58.14%) p value
24 h after surgery
 VAS at resting, Mean ± SD 1.18 ± 1.04 1.35 ± 1.09 0.012 a
≤ 3, n (%) 396 (97.54%) 543 (9.28%) 0.355
>  3, n (%) 10 (2.46%) 21 (3.72%)
 VAS at movement, Mean ± SD 2.84 ± 1.21 2.88 ± 1.29 0.579
≤ 3, n (%) 303 (74.3%) 401 (71.10%) 0.243
>  3, n (%) 103 (25.37%) 163 (28.90%)
 Dizzy, n (%) Mild 26 (6.48%) 51 (9.19%) 0.472
Moderate 21 (5.24%) 31 (5.59%)
Severe 9 (2.24%) 14 (2.52%)
 Nausea, n (%) 38 (9.43%) 81 (14.39%) 0.022 a
 Nausea associated with the gastric tube, n (%) 8 (1.99%) 24 (4.26%) 0.067
 Vomiting, n (%) 4 (0.99%) 17 (3.02%) 0.042 a
48 h after surgery
 VAS at resting, Mean ± SD 0.46 ± 0.66 0.62 ± 0.77 0.001 a
≤ 3, n (%) 398 (99.75%) 1 (0.25%) 0.645
>  3, n (%) 558 (9.47%) 3 (0.53%)
 VAS at movement, Mean ± SD 1.72 ± 0.90 1.81 ± 1.08 0.150
≤ 3, n (%) 385 (96.49%) 529 (94.30%) 0.127
>  3, n (%) 14 (3.51%) 32 (5.70%)
 Dizzy, n (%) Mild 16 (4.06%) 40 (7.18%) 0.124
Moderate 10 (2.54%) 20 (3.29%)
Severe 4 (1.02%) 3 (0.54%)
 Nausea, n (%) 19 (4.82%) 43 (7.69%) 0.084
 Nausea associated with the gastric tube, n  (%) 3 (0.76%) 7 (1.25%) 0.536
Vomiting, n (%) 6 (1.52%) 8 (1.43%) 1.000

Abbreviation: n = Number(s), % = Percentage(s), h = Hour(s), SD = Standard deviation, VAS = Visual analogue scale

aThe difference between the two groups was statistically significant, p <  0.05