Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 31;8(1):73–81. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.11

Table 2.

3D‐printed skull base simulation models

Study (first author surname, year of publication) Procedure studied Primary outcome
London Jr., 2021 Pediatric skull base/craniopharyngioma resection Fidelity of skeletonization of the carotid arteries and sella face
Maza, 2019 ICAI Time to hemostasis, estimated blood loss, trainee self‐confidence
Zheng, 2018 Skull base surgery Anatomic fidelity and educational value assessed on the questionnaire
Zhang, 2018 Sinus & skull base Educational value assessed on the questionnaire
Hsieh 2018 Skull base surgery Anatomic Accuracy, endoscopic anterior craniofacial resection, transpterygoid, and transclival approaches.
Muto, 2017 ICAI Educational value assessed on the questionnaire
Favier, 2017 Compares four 3D‐printed model to a cadaver for skull base surgery training 3D printing material best suited for training
Wen, 2016 Skull base surgery Drilling, curetting, and aspirating performance
Tai, 2016 Endoscopic endonasal drilling techniques Content validity
Shah, 2016 Skull base surgery Identification of anatomic structures
Oyama, 2015 Skull base surgery Exploratory study
Narayan, 2015 Skull base surgery Ease of learning endoscopic skull base exposure and drilling techniques
de Notaris, 2013 Various endoscopic endonasal approaches Descriptive report
Okuda, 2011 Transphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma Surgical technique using SurgTrainer & egg
Preoperative planning
Huang, 2019 Pituitary macroadenoma resection Operative performance in trainees who had pre‐op 3D models versus that of trainees who did not
Lin, 2018 Sellar tumor resection Fidelity
Shinomiya, 2018 Pituitary adenoma resection Utility in surgical planning

Abbreviations: 3D, three‐dimensional; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ICAI, internal carotid artery injury.