Table 2.
Study (first author surname, year of publication) | Procedure studied | Primary outcome |
---|---|---|
London Jr., 2021 | Pediatric skull base/craniopharyngioma resection | Fidelity of skeletonization of the carotid arteries and sella face |
Maza, 2019 | ICAI | Time to hemostasis, estimated blood loss, trainee self‐confidence |
Zheng, 2018 | Skull base surgery | Anatomic fidelity and educational value assessed on the questionnaire |
Zhang, 2018 | Sinus & skull base | Educational value assessed on the questionnaire |
Hsieh 2018 | Skull base surgery | Anatomic Accuracy, endoscopic anterior craniofacial resection, transpterygoid, and transclival approaches. |
Muto, 2017 | ICAI | Educational value assessed on the questionnaire |
Favier, 2017 | Compares four 3D‐printed model to a cadaver for skull base surgery training | 3D printing material best suited for training |
Wen, 2016 | Skull base surgery | Drilling, curetting, and aspirating performance |
Tai, 2016 | Endoscopic endonasal drilling techniques | Content validity |
Shah, 2016 | Skull base surgery | Identification of anatomic structures |
Oyama, 2015 | Skull base surgery | Exploratory study |
Narayan, 2015 | Skull base surgery | Ease of learning endoscopic skull base exposure and drilling techniques |
de Notaris, 2013 | Various endoscopic endonasal approaches | Descriptive report |
Okuda, 2011 | Transphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma | Surgical technique using SurgTrainer & egg |
Preoperative planning | ||
Huang, 2019 | Pituitary macroadenoma resection | Operative performance in trainees who had pre‐op 3D models versus that of trainees who did not |
Lin, 2018 | Sellar tumor resection | Fidelity |
Shinomiya, 2018 | Pituitary adenoma resection | Utility in surgical planning |
Abbreviations: 3D, three‐dimensional; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ICAI, internal carotid artery injury.