Skip to main content
. 2022 May 10;13:846789. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846789

TABLE 2.

Subgroup analysis of assessment.

Depression Anxiety

Assessment No. of Studies P (%) mean (95%CI) I2 P value Assessment No. of Studies P (%) mean (95%CI) I2 P value
PHQ-9 17 37.1% (27.4%–47.4%) 99% 0.00 GAD-7 20 33.5% (24.1%–43.6%) 99% 0.00
SDS 3 18.8% (14.9%–23.0%) 79% < 0.01 SAS 4 16.1% (2.0% –39.9%) 99% < 0.01
BDI-II 1 27.6% (22.8%–32.8%) / / BAI-21 3 26.4% (16.2%–38.1%) 94% < 0.01
CES-D 1 74.7% (69.8%–79.1%) / / STAI-A 1 22.7% (20.3%–25.2%) / /
DASS-21 3 26.0% (15.7%–37.9%) 95% < 0.01 DASS-21 3 24.9% (19.6%–30.6%) 89% < 0.01
HADS 4 46.4% (35.6%–57.4%) 94% < 0.01 HADS 4 58.5% (52.2%–64.6%) 78% < 0.01
DASS-42 2 65.6% (45.3%–83.3%) 96% < 0.01 DASS-42 2 61.5% (40.4%–80.6%) 97% < 0.01