Skip to main content
. 2022 May 9;24(5):e34347. doi: 10.2196/34347

Table 4.

Regression results associating environmental distractors with the Stop and Go Switching Task performance (N=6095).

Environmental influences Normal baseline Reverse baseline Nonswitch Switch

b (SE) P value b (SE) P value b (SE) P value b (SE) P value
Interrupted during test 0.08 (0.03) .006 0.08 (0.02) <.001 0.07 (0.01) <.001 0.15 (0.03) <.001
Being at home 0.01 (0.03) .81 0.01 (0.02) .54 0.02 (0.01) .13 0.01 (0.03) .61
Watching television 0.02 (0.02) .50 0.03 (0.02) .11 0.03 (0.01) .02 0.06 (0.02) .007
Listening to music or podcasts 0.03 (0.03) .33 0.01 (0.03) .77 0.00 (0.01) .84 −0.01 (0.03) .80
Talking to others −0.03 (0.04) .49 0.03 (0.03) .35 0.00 (0.02) .99 0.03 (0.04) .44
Texting or checking email 0.09 (0.11) .42 0.13 (0.09) .13 0.00 (0.05) .93 0.23 (0.10) .02
Following content on the internet 0.02 (0.11) .86 0.08 (0.09) .34 −0.01 (0.05) .83 0.00 (0.10) .97
Playing another game 0.26 (0.25) .29 −0.01 (0.21) .97 0.11 (0.11) .34 0.41 (0.24) .08