Comparison of performance of modified electrode with other 2,4-DNT sensors.
| Material | Technique | LODg (μM) | LDRf (μM) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G–LiClO4d | DPV | 14.98 | — | 30 |
| G–Na2SO4e | 31.4 | — | ||
| Functionalized 3DOM carbon electrodesl | SWVj | 3 | — | 31 |
| Pd–Pth | DPVc | 0.82 | 10–100 | 32 |
| Disposable SPEi | CV | 0.7 | 0–200 | 33 |
| Ag/Ca | CVb | 5 | — | 53 |
| ZnO–Ag2O composite nanoflowers modified gold electrodek | DPV | 0.013 | 0.4–40 | This work |
a
Ag/C: zero valent silver modified carbon fiber material.
b
CV: cyclic voltammetry.
c
DPV: differential pulse voltammetry.
d
G–LiClO4: lithium perchlorate exfoliated graphene sheet.
e
G–Na2SO4: sodium sulphate exfoliated graphene sheet.
f
LDR: linear detection range.
g
LOD: limit of detection.
h
Pd–Pt: palladium–platinum nanostructures.
i
SPE: screen printed electrode
j
SWV: square wave voltammetry.
k
ZnO–Ag2O: zinc oxide–silver oxide
l
3DOM: three dimensionally ordered macroporous.