Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Aug 27;122(2):363–370.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.07.008

Table 4.

Interaction of message arm and participant characteristics on thinking about harms in an online randomized experiment of the 2020 San Francisco sugary drink warning label, n=2,160 parents of children ages 6 months to 5 years

Participant Characteristics Impact of San
Francisco warninga
p for
interactionb
B (95% CI)
Age
 18-34 years 0.29 (0.16, 0.42) 0.60
 35 years or older 0.35 (0.1, 0.56)
Gender
 Male 0.21 (0.003, 0.41) 0.44
 Female 0.37 (0.2, 0.50)
 Transgender, nonbinary, or another gender identity 0.24 (−0.3, 0.86)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White 0.37 (0.0, 0.73) 0.54
 Non-Hispanic Black or African American 0.26 (0.0, 0.44)
 Hispanic or Latino(a) 0.37 (0.2, 0.52)
 Non-Hispanic other or multiracial 0.07 (−0.3, 0.48)
Educational attainment
 Some college or less 0.27 (0.11, 0.43) 0.44
 Two-year college degree or more 0.36 (0.2, 0.51)
Household income
 Less than $50,000/year 0.27 (0.1, 0.43) 0.53
 $50,000/year or more 0.34 (0.1, 0.50)
Language selected for survey administration
 Spanish 0.06 (−0.27, 0.40) 0.12
 English 0.34 (0.2, 0.46)
a

Difference in predicted mean level of thinking about health harms between San Francisco warning label and control arms at each level of the moderator

b

p for interaction is for Wald tests of joint significance of the coefficients on all interaction terms