Table 8.
Relationship between PIN and new loan information
| Variables | PIN | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Panel A: Relation between PIN and new loans | ||||
| Intercept | 0.4131*** | 0.3141*** | 0.3136*** | |
| (14.71) | (11.38) | (11.36) | ||
| New loan | 0.0031** | |||
| ( 2.26) | ||||
| New loan size | 0.0050* | |||
| ( 1.75) | ||||
| New Tbank | 0.0013 | |||
| ( 0.85) | ||||
| Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Year industry-fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Firm-fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Adjusted | 0.0600 | 0.0791 | 0.0791 | |
| Obs. | 43,525 | 43,525 | 43,525 | |
| Variables | PIN | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Panel B: Relation between PIN and new overdue loans | ||||
| Loan information (LI) | OL | OL rate | OL Tbank | OL Nbank |
| Intercept | 0.4200*** | 0.4171*** | 0.4181*** | 0.4197*** |
| (10.64) | (10.58) | (10.61) | (10.62) | |
| New LI | 0.0019 | 0.0287 | 0.0168 | 0.0022 |
| (0.33) | (1.03) | (1.16) | (0.48) | |
| New LI t-1 | 0.0032 | 0.0420 | 0.0221 | 0.0041 |
| (0.44) | (1.63) | (1.16) | (0.73) | |
| New LI t-2 | 0.0064 | 0.0212 | 0.0081 | 0.0082** |
| ( 1.30) | ( 0.98) | ( 0.93) | ( 2.00) | |
| New LI t-3 | 0.0132*** | 0.0129 | 0.0219*** | 0.0094** |
| ( 2.79) | ( 0.67) | ( 2.64) | ( 2.08) | |
| Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year industry-fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Firm-fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Adjusted | 0.0687 | 0.0686 | 0.0687 | 0.0687 |
| Obs. | 26,022 | 26,022 | 26,022 | 26,022 |
This table reports the OLS results of the tests on the relationships between PIN and new loan information. It represents the results of the regression: , where PIN is the measure for information asymmetry in the stock market. Variables of new loans in Panel A are New Loan, New Loan Size, and New Tbank. Variables of new overdue loans in Panel B are New OL, New OL rate, New OL Tbank, and New OL Nbank. The control variables in previous tables are included in the regressions, and the t-statistics reported are based on standard errors clustered by firm. Symbols *, **, and *** indicate significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively