Table 2.
CONNECT participants experience with and attitudes towards drug use, OPS, and other harm reduction interventions stratified by OPS support in Baltimore, Maryland (N = 135)
Total | Support OPS in neighborhood | p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
(N = 135) | No (n = 47; 35%) | Yes (n = 88; 65%) | ||
Col % | Row % | Row % | ||
Attitudes towards people who use drugs | ||||
Should be arrested | 60 (44.4) | 26 (43.3) | 34 (56.7) | 0.063 |
Are dangerous | 77 (57.0) | 36 (46.8) | 41 (53.2) | 0.001 |
Deserve respect | 107 (79.3) | 37 (34.6) | 70 (65.4) | 0.911 |
Deserve access to treatment | 129 (95.6) | 42 (32.6) | 87 (67.4) | 0.011 |
Workplace exposures | ||||
Some or all people entering the business use drugs | 122 (91.7) | 41 (33.6) | 81 (66.4) | 0.195 |
Perceived drugs commonly used around workplace+ | ||||
Opioids (fentanyl, heroin, pills) | 107 (84.3) | 30 (28.0) | 77 (72.0) | 0.018 |
Stimulants (cocaine, crack cocaine, crystal methamphetamine) | 98 (77.2) | 29 (29.6) | 69 (70.4) | 0.233 |
Workplace drug exposure scale components + | ||||
Found drugs | 63 (48.1) | 19 (30.2) | 44 (69.8) | 0.331 |
Found drug paraphernalia | 65 (49.6) | 21 (32.3) | 44 (67.7) | 0.625 |
Seen drug use | 87 (66.4) | 26 (29.9) | 61 (70.1) | 0.130 |
Seen drug dealing | 90 (68.7) | 30 (33.3) | 60 (66.7) | 0.716 |
Asked somebody to leave or banned them due to drug use | 82 (61.2) | 26 (31.7) | 56 (68.3) | 0.305 |
Called 911 due to drug use or overdose | 46 (34.3) | 15 (32.6) | 31 (67.4) | 0.665 |
Witnessed an overdose in or around business+ | 61 (46.6) | 15 (24.6) | 46 (75.4) | 0.024 |
Exposure to harm reduction interventions | ||||
Heard of naloxone | 94 (69.6) | 28 (29.8) | 66 (70.2) | 0.063 |
Had naloxone in business | 35 (37.6) | 8 (22.9) | 27 (77.1) | 0.255 |
Any employees trained to administer naloxone | 44 (48.9) | 10 (22.7) | 34 (77.3) | 0.171 |
Ever administered naloxone | 10 (7.6) | 2 (20.0) | 8 (80.0) | 0.493 |
Heard of OPS before this study | 56 (41.5) | 15 (26.8) | 41 (73.2) | 0.142 |
+past 6 months