Skip to main content
. 2022 May 17;2022:3288948. doi: 10.1155/2022/3288948

Table 10.

The results of network meta-analysis of improvement of ADL.

EA + CM

4.78 (−2.25, 11.71) SA + CM
3.69 (−3.37, 10.55) −1.15 (−4.78, 2.55) MA + CM
6.27 (−1.48, 14.18) 1.52 (−3.62, 6.90) 2.66 (−2.45, 7.88) FA + CM
5.98 (−0.65, 12.69) 1.18 (−1.94, 4.51) 2.31 (−0.74, 5.49) −0.31 (−5.18, 4.55) MA
8.42 (−0.25, 16.83) 3.61 (−2.60, 9.91) 4.71 (−1.36, 10.76) 2.06 (−5.18, 9.25) 2.41 (−3.71, 8.34) EA
7.94 (0.86, 15.02) 3.17 (−0.33, 6.73) 4.30 (0.39, 8.09) 1.61 (−3.98, 6.94) 1.96 (−1.50, 5.28) −0.49 (−6.86, 5.87) SA
3.93 (−3.43, 11.41) −0.84 (−5.37, 3.62) 0.31 (−4.14, 4.72) −2.34 (−8.18, 3.43) −2.02 (−5.24, 1.14) −4.43 (−11.05, 2.24) −3.99 (−8.51, 0.62) WA
7.94 (1.53, 14.49) 3.14 (0.54, 5.90) 4.26 (1.81, 6.83) 1.62 (−2.99, 6.12) 1.94 (0.07, 3.76) −0.46 (−6.13, 5.27) −0.01 (−2.81, 2.91) 3.97 (0.41, 7.63) CM

Notes. Significant difference, MA: manual acupuncture, EA: electronic acupuncture, WA: warm acupuncture, FA: fire acupuncture, SA: scalp acupuncture, and CM: conventional medicine.