Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Health. 2021 Nov 25;34(4-5):750–760. doi: 10.1177/08982643211055032

Table 4.

Linear regression model examining the association between optimism and Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) Mental scores: MrOS (N=1,670)

Model 1
β coefficient
(SE)
Model 2
β coefficient
(SE)
Model 3
β coefficient
(SE)
Model 4
β coefficient
(SE)
Personality Measure
Optimism −1.46 (0.20)* −1.53 (0.20)* −0.71 (0.20)* −0.72 (0.20)*

Demographics
Age 0.26 (0.05)* 0.27 (0.05)* 0.16 (0.05)* 0.17 (0.05)*
Race (ref=White) −0.18 (1.23)
  Black −1.30 (1.13)
  Asian 1.55 (1.34)
  Hispanic 1.48 (1.70)
  Other
Education (ref= ≤high school)
  Some/all college 0.87 (0.57)
  Some/all graduate school 0.85 (0.57)

Psychological and Behavioral Factors
Cognitive Functiona −0.07 (0.03)* −0.07 (0.02)*
Good/Excellent Health Status −2.16 (0.66)* −1.97 (0.67)*
Depressive Symptomsb 4.83 (0.86)* 4.90 (0.86)*
Sleep Disturbancec 2.04 (0.39)* 2.01 (0.39)*
Physical Activityd −0.02 (0.00)* −0.02 (0.00)*

Health-related Conditions
Hypertension 0.10 (0.34)
Heart Failure 0.58 (0.70)
Stroke 0.62 (0.88)
Heart Attack −0.50 (0.57)
Diabetes 0.83 (0.54)
Body Mass Index, kg/m2 0.03 (0.05)

Note. SE=Standard Error

a

Cognitive function was measured with Teng Mini Mental Scale (0-100); higher score = better cognitive functioning

b

Significant depressive symptoms are indicated with a score ≥ 6 on the Geriatric Depression Scale

c

Sleep disturbance is indicated with a score >5 on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

d

Physical activity was measured with Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) score; higher score = more physically active

*

p≤.05