Table 1.
Randomization | Blinding | Incomplete outcome data | Selective outcome reporting | Similarity of groups at baseline | Control of confounding and interaction | Conflict of interest | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes (adequate) | Yes |
Yes, Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned |
No | Yes | Yes (adequate) | No | Yewale et al. [14] |
Yes (adequate) | Yes |
Yes, Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned |
No | No | No (inadequate) | No | Azangookhiavi et al. [14] |
Yes (adequate) | Yes |
Yes, Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned |
No | No | No (inadequate) | No | Dhamija et al. [16] |
Yes (adequate) | Yes | No | No | No | No (inadequate) | No | Ahmed et al. [17] |
No (inadequate) | No | No | No | No | No (inadequate) | No | De Angelis et al. [23] |
Yes (adequate) | Yes |
Yes, Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned |
No | No | Yes (adequate) | No | Kollati et al. [18] |
No (inadequate) | No |
Yes, Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned |
No | No | No (inadequate) |
Yes, The material was given by a company for free |
Mendoza-Azpur et al. [24] |
Yes (adequate) | Yes | No | No | No | Yes (adequate) |
Yes, the study was funded by a dental company |
Clark et al. [19] |
No (inadequate) | No | No | No | No | No (inadequate) | No | Zhang et al. [25] |
Yes (adequate) | Yes |
Yes, Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned |
No | No | No (inadequate) | No | Kumar et al. [20] |
Yes (adequate) | No | No | No | No | No (inadequate) | No | Thakkar et al. [22] |
Yes (adequate) | Yes | No | No | No | No (inadequate) | No | Hauser et al. [21] |