Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 25;19(3):463–475. doi: 10.1007/s13770-021-00428-y

Table 1.

Risk of bias assessment

Randomization Blinding Incomplete outcome data Selective outcome reporting Similarity of groups at baseline Control of confounding and interaction Conflict of interest References
Yes (adequate) Yes

Yes,

Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned

No Yes Yes (adequate) No Yewale et al. [14]
Yes (adequate) Yes

Yes,

Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned

No No No (inadequate) No Azangookhiavi et al. [14]
Yes (adequate) Yes

Yes,

Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned

No No No (inadequate) No Dhamija et al. [16]
Yes (adequate) Yes No No No No (inadequate) No Ahmed et al. [17]
No (inadequate) No No No No No (inadequate) No De Angelis et al. [23]
Yes (adequate) Yes

Yes,

Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned

No No Yes (adequate) No Kollati et al. [18]
No (inadequate) No

Yes,

Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned

No No No (inadequate)

Yes,

The material was given by a company for free

Mendoza-Azpur et al. [24]
Yes (adequate) Yes No No No Yes (adequate)

Yes,

the study was funded by a dental company

Clark et al. [19]
No (inadequate) No No No No No (inadequate) No Zhang et al. [25]
Yes (adequate) Yes

Yes,

Type of tooth extracted was not mentioned

No No No (inadequate) No Kumar et al. [20]
Yes (adequate) No No No No No (inadequate) No Thakkar et al. [22]
Yes (adequate) Yes No No No No (inadequate) No Hauser et al. [21]