Fig. 5.

Mechanical testing of control (Native goat artrey), different decellularized artery scaffold obtained from different decellularization methods, subcutaneously transplanted scaffold (DA) and transplantation Studies (hDA). Mechanical testing of all samples compared with native HSV. Graph1: Strain testing in DHSV was significantly lower, after implantation in CAM, subcutaneous transplantation, and graft transplantation there was no significant difference. Graph2: Stress test was showing in native and after graft transplantation, there was no significant difference. Graph3: Tensile strength in native HSV and biocompatibility in CAM, subcutaneous implant, and transplanted graft was a significant difference. Graph4: Elasticity testing showing there was no significant difference in biocompatibility in CAM, subcutaneous implant, and transplanted graft. Graph5: Burst pressure statistically no difference in native HSV and transplanted graft. Graph6: Suture retention strength (MPa) measured of control (Native goat artery), decellularized scaffold and heparinized graft. The suture retention strength of all three groups shows no significant difference and no harmful effect by loading of heparin in decellularized scaffold