Skip to main content
. 2022 May 11;9:859292. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.859292

Table 1A.

Significantly upregulated proteins with Aquamin in high-fat mice.

MS-NASH C57BL6
Proteins Genes Aquamin OCA (Low-Fat)
UDP-N-acetylhexosamine pyrophosphorylase-like protein 1 Uap1l1 1.9 ± 0.8* 0.9 ± 0.4 1.1 ± 0.2
Biglycan Bgn 1.7 ± 0.5* 1.5 ± 0.6 0.8 ± 0.3
Tax1-binding protein 3 Tax1bp3 1.6 ± 0.5* 1.6 ± 1.1 1.1 ± 0.5
Succinyl-CoA:3-ketoacid coenzyme A transferase 1, mitochondrial Oxct1 1.6 ± 0.3* 1.4 ± 0.2* 1.2 ± 0.4
Glycogen phosphorylase, brain form Pygb 1.5 ± 0.3* 0.9 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.1
Acyl-coenzyme A thioesterase 9, mitochondrial Acot9 1.5 ± 0.4* 1.3 ± 0.6 0.8 ± 0.6
CD166 antigen Alcam 1.5 ± 0.4* 1.3 ± 0.5 1.2 ± 0.2*
Erythrocyte band seven integral membrane protein Stom 1.5 ± 0.4* 1.2 ± 0.5 0.9 ± 0.5
RNA-binding protein 3 Rbm3 1.5 ± 0.3* 1.4 ± 0.4* 1.2 ± 0.3
Angiotensinogen Agt 1.5 ± 0.4* 1.1 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.4*
Apolipoprotein A-I Apoa1 1.5 ± 0.3* 1.0 ± 0.3 0.8 ± 0.2
Heparin cofactor 2 Serpind1 1.5 ± 0.4* 1.2 ± 0.6 1.1 ± 0.4

These values (in this table) represent average (± standard deviation) fold-change of abundance ratios for each altered (upregulated) protein compared to the high-fat control group (MS-NASH mice on a high-fat diet) with a 1.5-fold change threshold in response to Aquamin intervention and are significant with a p-value <0.05 (*). For each upregulated protein with Aquamin, corresponding values from the other two groups are shown for comparison. These liver samples (from five mice in each group) were individually assessed by TMT-based differential proteomic expression and data were merged to get averages. Protein FDR Confidence for all proteins was ≤ 1%. Asterisks indicate statistical significance as compared to High-fat control at p <0.05. FDR, False Discovery Rate. These data are also presented in Figure 4.