Skip to main content
. 2022 May 25;289(1975):20220347. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0347

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Relationship between male–male dyadic bond strength (DSI value) and dyadic rate of coalitionary support. Dyads with stronger bonds were more likely to support each other in coalitions (GLMM: n = 958, p < 0.001). DSI values are represented in log-scale and binned in 19 bins. The area of the circles depicts the frequency with which a given number of coalitions per contact hour occurred in a given bin (mean = 3.29, range = 1 to 232). The solid line depicts the fitted model and the dashed lines depict the bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals with all other predictors being at their average (party and year manually dummy coded and centred). (Online version in colour.)