Table 2.
Estimated odds ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for predictors of GSDOA awareness among participants as determined by hierarchical logistic regression
| GSDOA Awarenessa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple Bivariate OR (95% CI) | Block 1 (Demographics) AOR (95% CI) | Block 2 (Overdose Response) AOR (95% CI) | Block 3 (Overdose Characteristics) AOR (95% CI) | |
| Demographic Characteristics | ||||
| Age (years) | ||||
| 16 – 24 | — | — | — | — |
| 25 – 34 | 2.31 (1.24, 4.31) ** | 2.15 (1.14, 4.07) * | 2.77 (1.42, 5.41) ** | 2.18 (1.09, 4.35) * |
| 35 – 44 | 1.89 (1.02, 3.51) * | 1.74 (0.92, 3.28) | 2.06 (1.07, 3.96) * | 1.59 (0.81, 3.14) |
| 45 – 54 | 1.35 (0.74, 2.47) | 1.24 (0.66, 2.32) | 1.42 (0.75, 2.69) | 1.21 (0.62, 2.34) |
| 55 + | 1.43 (0.71, 2.90) | 1.31 (0.63, 2.71) | 1.47 (0.70, 3.10) | 1.36 (0.63, 2.95) |
| Gender | ||||
| Cis man | — | — | — | — |
| Cis woman | 0.96 (0.63, 1.47) | 1.02 (0.66, 1.58) | 0.91 (0.58, 1.42) | 1.01 (0.63, 1.60) |
| Trans and gender expansive | 0.37 (0.12, 1.11) | 0.47 (0.15, 1.47) | 0.46 (0.15, 1.45) | 0.54 (0.17, 1.72) |
| Overdose Response Resources | ||||
| Cellphone possession | ||||
| Yes | 1.71 (1.10, 2.66) * | 2.15 (1.34, 3.47) ** | 2.36 (1.44, 3.86) *** | |
| No | — | — | — | |
| Overdose Characteristics | ||||
| Perceived risk of overdoseb | ||||
| Ever | 1.82 (1.21, 2.75) ** | 1.47 (0.93, 2.31) | ||
| Never | — | — | ||
| Opioid overdose witnessed | ||||
| Yes | 2.62 (1.70, 4.05) *** | 2.29 (1.42, 3.70) *** | ||
| No | — | — | ||
| LR Pseudo–R2 | 0.019 | 0.040 | 0.080 | |
| Pseudo–R2 change | 0.019 | 0.021** | 0.040 *** | |
Reference categories are denoted by “—"; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
aFinal model size N = 340 after excluding individuals with “unknown” responses for all variables
b “Never” = “Never”; “Ever” = “Rarely/sometimes/often/all the time”