Table 4.
Effect of Lys-Lys on bacteria at the phylum and family levels in pigletsa.
| Item | Control | 0.1% Lys-Lys | 1% Lys-Lys | 5% Lys-Lys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | ||||
| Firmicutes | 0.76 ± 0.04 | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 0.73 ± 0.06 | 0.69 ± 0.07 |
| Bacteroidetes | 0.20 ± 0.04 | 0.21 ± 0.07 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.07 |
| Proteobacteria | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| Family | ||||
| Ruminococcaceae | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.05 | 0.42 ± 0.08 |
| Bacteroidales | 0.13 ± 0.30 | 0.12 ± 0.06 | 0.06 ± 0.02* | 0.06 ± 0.02 |
| Erysipelotrichaceae | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 0.11 ± 0.05 | 0.05 ± 0.02 |
| Prevotellaceae | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.06 |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.002 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 7).
Different from control, P < 0.05.