Table 2.
AMSTAR score of included reviews on depressive symptoms/major depression and associated factors on HIV/AIDS patients.
| AMSTAR criteria | Bernard et al. (4) | Amare et al. (20) | Tsai (23) | Necho et al. (21) | Patel et al. (22) | Ayano et al. (5) | DiMatteo et al. (27) | Wang et al. (24) | Ciesla et al. (28) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Was a priori design provided? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 2. Was there duplicate study selection and data extraction? | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| 3. Was a comprehensive literature search performed? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 4. Was status of the publication (e.g., gray literature) used as inclusion criteria? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| 5. Was a list of included and excluded studies provided? | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| 6. Was the characteristics of included studies provided? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| 7. Was the scientific quality of included studies assessed and reported? | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| 8. Was the scientific quality of included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions? | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| 9. Were the methods used to combine the findings of the study appropriate? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 10. Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 11. Was the conflict of interest stated? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |