Table 2.
Multinomial logistic regression model of the association between BMI categories and nutrition literacy.
Factor | Model 1 a | Model 2 b | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p–value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p–value | |
Nutrition Literacy (NL) | ||||
Normal (Ref) | ||||
Underweight | 0.86 (0.79–0.93) | <0.001 | 0.91 (0.83–0.99) | 0.029 |
Overweight | 1.00 (0.90–1.10) | 0.954 | 0.87 (0.79–0.97) | 0.012 |
Obese | 0.80 (0.74–0.86) | <0.001 | 0.84 (0.77–0.91) | <0.001 |
Functional Nutrition Literacy (FNL) | ||||
Normal (Ref) | ||||
Underweight | 0.85 (0.78–0.93) | <0.001 | 0.92 (0.84–1.00) | 0.060 |
Overweight | 0.96 (0.86–1.06) | 0.400 | 0.81 (0.73–0.90) | <0.001 |
Obese | 0.70 (0.64–0.76) | <0.001 | 0.73 (0.67–0.80) | <0.001 |
Interactive Nutritional Literacy (INL) | ||||
Normal (Ref) | ||||
Underweight | 0.91 (0.84–0.99) | 0.035 | 0.95 (0.87–1.04) | 0.252 |
Overweight | 1.01 (0.91–1.12) | 0.831 | 0.95 (0.86–1.06) | 0.365 |
Obese | 0.93 (0.86–1.00) | 0.065 | 0.94 (0.87–1.02) | 0.148 |
Critical Nutrition Literacy (CNL) | ||||
Normal (Ref) | ||||
Underweight | 0.93 (0.86–1.01) | 0.107 | 0.94 (0.87–1.03) | 0.171 |
Overweight | 0.99 (0.89–1.09) | 0.764 | 0.96 (0.86–1.06) | 0.410 |
Obese | 1.01 (0.93–1.09) | 0.855 | 1.02 (0.95–1.12) | 0.495 |
Model 1 unadjusted.
Model 2 adjusted for gender, grade, ethnicity, primary caregiver, parent's education, boarding school, and residence.