Jahanian 2021.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Study design: phase 3 randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial with parallel assignment Number of study centres and location: single centre; Imam Khomeini Hospital in Sari, Mazandaran Province, Iran Study setting: emergency department (ED) Withdrawals: stated Date of study: September 2016 to February 2018 |
|
Participants | Number screened: 72
Number randomised: 60
Number in treatment group: 30
Number in placebo group: 30
Mean age (years): 62.9 (SD 7.3) (magnesium); 65.8 (SD 3.1) (placebo) Gender (male/female): 5/25 (magnesium); 9/21 (placebo) Diagnostic criteria: physician diagnosed Disease duration of less than 5 years (n): 20 (magnesium); 18 (placebo) Smoking history Current smokers: 16 (magnesium); 17 (placebo) Inclusion criteria: adults with known clinically diagnosed moderate COPD (FEV1/FVC < 70%, 30 < FEV1 < 50, often symptomatic with shortness of breath) with the acute attack symptoms including changes in the severity of shortness of breath, cough, and sputum volume Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Intervention: intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate (2 g in 100 mL of normal saline) over 30 minutes Placebo: intravenous infusion of 0.9% normal saline (100 mL) over 30 minutes After receiving standard treatment for COPD exacerbation:
|
|
Outcomes | FEV1, RR, PR, SpO2 and 0 to 10 Borg dyspnoea scale at 45 minutes and 6 hours after the commencement of intervention | |
Notes | Funding for studies: Clinical Research Development Unit of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran Conflicts of interest of trial authors: declared none Clinical Trials Registry: IRCT20150315021480N8 (Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials Database) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation was done using a computer‐generated random numbering system with the help of a nurse who was blinded to the study groups. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation was done using a sealed envelope technique with the help of a nurse who was blinded to the study groups. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All drugs were prepared in syringes in the same size, colour, volume, and shape. The syringes were labelled as A or B by a pharmacist and were administered by a nurse. Particpants were unaware of the type of medication they were receiving. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details provided for outcome assessment. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | There were no dropouts from either arm. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Trial was registered on website, all outcome measures were reported as planned. Moreover, the authors stated their willingness to share the data upon request. |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified. |