Table 1.
Samples collected in 23 lesser horseshoe bat maternity roost during June–July 2011
| Department | Roost | Effective size | Genotypes | Individuals | PCR-positive | Faecal DNA prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doubs | AL | 153 (60; 244) | 22 | 20 | 1 | 0.05 (0.00; 0.24) |
| BA | 24 (14; 44) | 20 | 12 | 1 | 0.08 (0.00; 0.35) | |
| BE | 49 (20; 124) | 19 | 14 | 0 | 0.00 (0.00; 0.22) | |
| CD | 16 (10; 28) | 17 | 9 | 4 | 0.44 (0.19; 0.81) | |
| CL | 30 (17; 56) | 22 | 14 | 11 | 0.79 (0.52; 0.92) | |
| CM | 18 (12; 29) | 21 | 11 | 2 | 0.18 (0.05; 0.48) | |
| EC | 82 (28; 246) | 20 | 16 | 0 | 0.00 (0.00; 0.19) | |
| EP | 27 (15; 50) | 21 | 13 | 2 | 0.15 (0.04; 0.42) | |
| ET | 16 (10; 28) | 17 | 9 | 3 | 0.33 (0.06; 0.64) | |
| FO | 59 (20; 181) | 17 | 13 | 1 | 0.08 (0.00; 0.42) | |
| LP | 37 (19; 76) | 22 | 15 | 0 | 0.00 (0.00; 0.30) | |
| RA | 51 (18; 158) | 16 | 12 | 5 | 0.42 (0.19; 0.68 | |
| SO | 39 (19; 88) | 20 | 14 | 6 | 0.43 (0.16; 0.67) | |
| Haute-Saône | CH | 24 (14; 44) | 20 | 12 | 1 | 0.08 (0.00; 0.45) |
| EM | 31 (15; 68) | 12 | 10 | 1 | 0.10 (0.01; 0.40) | |
| FB | 38 (14; 115) | 14 | 10 | 1 | 0.10 (0.01; 0.40) | |
| Jura | AM | 16 (11; 25) | 23 | 11 | 9 | 0.82 (0.52; 0.95) |
| AR | 28 (12; 70) | 15 | 10 | 4 | 0.40 (0.17; 0.69) | |
| BT | 107 (36; 231) | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0.10 (0.00; 0.40) | |
| CV | 20 (10; 43) | 20 | 10 | 1 | 0.10 (0.01; 0.40) | |
| GI | 18 (12; 29) | 21 | 11 | 0 | 0.00 (0.00; 0.26) | |
| MF | 38 (16; 95) | 17 | 12 | 3 | 0.25 (0.09; 0.53) | |
| OF | 18 (11; 33) | 18 | 10 | 6 | 0.60 (0.31; 0.83) | |
| Total | 469 (417; 530) | 425 | 278 | 63 | 0.23 (0.18; 0.28) |
Department, administrative French department; Roost, code name of the village hosting the maternity roost; Effective size, estimated number of individuals in the colony based on a sequential Bayesian estimator; Genotypes, number of reliable genotypes based on 24 collected faeces samples; PCR-positive, mean number of individuals positive after 100 resampling tests for A. phagocytophilum; Individuals, number of distinct individuals; Faecal DNA prevalence, mean number of individuals positive/number of distinct individuals, numbers in brackets are confidence intervals (95%) based on a bootstrap procedure.