Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 2;26(2):71–79. doi: 10.1089/apb.20.0042

Table 2.

Effect of H2O2 decontamination methods on viruses and microorganisms

References Media Method and dose Phase times (min) Organism Effectiveness (log reduction)
6 3M 1860, 1870, 1804 and AO 1054 FFRs (N = 1) VHP™
(Steris ARD)
5 g/min then 2.2 g/min
Gas 3;
Dwell 30
>750 ppm
VSV
SARS-CoV-2
≥6
7 3M 1860S FFR pieces inoculated VHP
(Steris ARD)
410 ppm
180 SARS-CoV-2 ≥5
8 AO N9504C FFR pieces inoculated VHP
1000 ppm
10 SARS-CoV-2 ≥6
6 3M 1860, 1870, 1804, and AO 1054 FFRs HPGP (STERRAD 100NX) 47 VSV ≥6
12 3M 1860 N95 FFR inoculated with droplets or aerosol HPV (Bioquell)
2 g/min then 0.5 g/min
Inject 20;
Dwell 150
Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores ≥6
13 3M 1870 inoculated (N = 3 for each phage) HPV (Bioquell)
16 g/min
Inject 30–40;
Dwell 25
Phage phi-6
Phage T7
Phage T1
≥6
14 3M 1860 pieces inoculated HPV (Bioquell)
16 g/min
446–495 ppm
Dwell 20 Phage (MS2, Phi6)
Influenza
MHV
Escherichia coli
Staphylococcus aureus
Aspergillus niger
G. stearothermophilus spores
≥2–5
15 3M 1860, 1870+, 8511, 9211, HW N11125 FFRs inoculated Curis Inject 12;
Dwell 50
Herpes Simplex Virus 1
Coxsackievirus B3
Phage phi6
≥6

FFR, filtering facepiece respirator; HPGP, hydrogen peroxide gas plasma; MHV, mouse hepatitis virus; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus.