Skip to main content
. 2022 May 23;10(5):23259671221098748. doi: 10.1177/23259671221098748

Table 1.

Medial Patellofemoral Distance Between the MPFC-Intact and MPFC-Deficient States as Measured Using Portable Ultrasound a

MPFC Distance, mm, Mean ± SD Difference, Intact vs Deficient
Testing Condition Intact Deficient Mean (95% CI), mm Change, % P Value b
0° of flexion
 0 N 13.5 ± 1.8 16.4 ± 1.7 2.9 (1.1-4.6) 21.5 .005
 20 N 17.2 ± 1.4 21.2 ± 2.7 4.0 (1.7-6.2) 23.3 .004
10° of flexion
 0 N 13.7 ± 2.2 17.3 ± 2.6 3.6 (1.5-5.7) 26.3 .005
 20 N 17.7 ± 1.5 22.8 ± 3.6 5.1 (2.7-7.4) 28.8 .001
20° of flexion
 0 N 13.7 ± 1.6 17.8 ± 1.8 4.1 (2.3-6.0) 29.9 .001
 20 N 18.3 ± 1.9 24.3 ± 2.7 6.0 (4.1-7.8) 32.8 <.001
30° of flexion
 0 N 14.6 ± 1.8 17.9 ± 1.6 3.3 (2.0-4.7) 22.6 <.001
 20 N 18.9 ± 2.3 24.4 ± 1.9 5.5 (4.2-6.9) 29.1 <.001
40° of flexion
 0 N 14.9 ± 2.2 18.8 ± 2.0 4.9 (2.9-6.9) 26.2 .001
 20 N 19.1 ± 2.8 24.7 ± 2.7 5.8 (3.8-7.7) 30 <.001

a MPFC, medial patellofemoral complex.

b All P values indicate statistically significant difference between the intact and deficient states (P < .05).