Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 20;16(5):6960–7079. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c09150

Figure 36.

Figure 36

Calculated magnetization of the antisite defect. (a) Occupation number versus rigid potential shifts α for antisite defects for the bare, noninteracting potential χ0 and the interacting potential χ. From the angular coefficients of both curves we can extract the optimum ULR for our system, ULR = Inline graphic – χ–1.385 (b) Variation of the local magnetization at the defect antisite versus U. At U = 0, no magnetic moments are observed as the defect shows a symmetric configuration at the Mo–Mo bonds. At U > 0.5 eV, this symmetry is broken and the defect develops an appreciable magnetic moment that increases with U as a result of the increased localization of the bands. All panels are adapted with permission under a Creative Common CC BY-NC license from ref (382). Copyright 2019 AAAS.