Table 3.
Nº of studies | Study design | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | Effect | Certainty |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age: [38] Harrold, [39] Adams 2001, [35] Williams, [37] Stark | ||||||||
4 | observational studies | seriousa | seriousb | not serious | seriousc | all plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect | Most studies showed increased workload with patient´s age |
⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
Gender: [38] Harrold, [39] Adams 2001 | ||||||||
2 | observational studies | not seriousa | not serious | not serious | seriousd | all plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect | Higher workload in man |
⨁⨁⨁⨁ High |
Functional status: [32] Bonifassi, [38] Harrold | ||||||||
2 | observational studies | seriousa | not serious | Very seriouse,f | seriousa,c |
all plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect dose response gradient |
Increased workload in patients with poorer functional status |
⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
Clinical diagnoses: [38] Harrold J, [28] Adams 2000, [29] Lee, [44] Trisolini, [35] Williams, [34] Cox, | ||||||||
6 | observational studies | seriousa | not serious | seriousf | seriousa,c |
all plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect |
There is an association between workload and the number or type of clinical diagnoses of patients |
⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
Visit type: [44] Trisolini, [30] Payne | ||||||||
2 | observational studies | seriousa | Not serious | Seriousf | Seriousc |
all plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated large effect |
New admissions increased workload |
⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate |
Rural environment: [39] Adams 2001 | ||||||||
1 | observational studies | not serious | not serious | not serious | not serious |
strong association all plausible residual confounding would reduce the demonstrated effect dose response gradient |
Living in a rural locale increased workload comparison to living in an urban locale |
⨁⨁⨁⨁ High |
a Convience sample overall the studies
b Different results on effect size, direction of association and significance
c Precision of results not reported in most of the studies
d The standard error of some of the studies is large
e Very specific population. Generalization problems
f Different ways of measuring outcome (workload) and factor