Table 4.
Grade evidence profile table for PICO 2.2.
| Certainty assessment | Impact | Certainty | Importance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| № of cases | Study design | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | |||
| Maternal recovery | |||||||||
| 23 | Case report | Seriousa | Not serious | Not serious | Not assessed | Publication bias strongly suspectedb | Maternal recovery was good to excellent in 23 out of 23 cases | ⊕○○○ VERY LOW | CRITICAL |
| Healthy baby | |||||||||
| 19 | Case report | Seriousa | Not serious | Not serious | Not assessed | Publication bias strongly suspectedb | Healthy baby was delivered in 18 out of 19 cases, 95% | ⊕○○○ VERY LOW | CRITICAL |
| Abortion or medical termination of pregnancy | |||||||||
| 19 | Case report | Seriousa | Not serious | Not serious | Not assessed | Publication bias strongly suspectedb | Abortion or MTP occurred in 1 out of 19 cases, 5% | ⊕○○○ VERY LOW | CRITICAL |
| Intracranial haemorrhage | |||||||||
| 23 | Case report | Seriousa | Not serious | Not serious | Not assessed | Publication bias strongly suspectedb | Intracerebral haemorrhage occurred in 2 out of 23 cases ,9% | ⊕○○○ VERY LOW | IMPORTANT |
| Intrauterine bleeding | |||||||||
| 23 | Case report | Seriousa | Not serious | Not serious | Not assessed | Publication bias strongly suspectedb | No case reported intrauterine bleeding | ⊕○○○ VERY LOW | IMPORTANT |
CI: Confidence interval.
aNot evaluated in these case reports.
bOnly a few case reports mentioned this outcome, MTP:medically terminated pregnancy