1. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT)
and stroke risk |
In menopausal women we suggest against
the use of HRT to reduce the risk of ischaemic
stroke. |
|
1.1. In menopausal women, does HRT
compared to non-prior HRT reduce the risk of
ischaemic stroke? |
Quality of evidence: Very low ⊕ |
|
|
Strength of recommendation: Weak
against intervention ↓ |
|
1.2 In menopausal women,
does HRT compared to non-prior HRT reduce the risk
of haemorrhagic stroke in primary prevention? |
In menopausal women we suggest against
the use of HRT to reduce the risk of haemorrhagic
stroke. |
|
Quality of evidence: Low ⊕⊕ |
Strength of recommendation: Weak
against intervention ↓ |
1.3 In menopausal women
with acute ischaemic stroke, does prior HRT compared
with non-prior HRT impact functional outcome and
mortality? |
In menopausal women with acute
ischaemic stroke we suggest against the use of HRT
to reduce mortality. Quality of evidence: Very low
⊕ |
|
Strength of recommendation: Weak
against intervention ↓ |
2. Treatment of acute ischaemic stroke
in pre-menopausal women (pregnancy, postpartum, and
menstruation) |
Since only data from case
reports are available, a specific recommendation on
IVT in pregnant women cannot be made. |
A majority of members
suggests that pregnant women with acute disabling
ischaemic stroke, can be treated with IVT. |
2.1 In pregnant women with acute
ischaemic stroke does intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)
improve outcome as compared to no IVT? |
2.2 In women with acute ischaemic
stroke during the postpartum period does IVT improve
outcome as compared to no IVT? |
Since only data from case reports are
available, a specific recommendation on IVT in
postpartum women cannot be made. |
All members suggest that postpartum
women, occurring at least 10 days after delivery,
can be treated with IVT. |
2.3 In women with acute ischaemic
stroke during menstruation does IVT improve outcome
as compared to no IVT? |
Since only data from case reports are
available, a specific recommendation on IVT in women
during menstruation cannot be made. |
All members suggest that women with
acute ischaemic stroke during menstruation, can be
treated with IVT. |
2.4 In women with acute
ischaemic stroke during pregnancy does mechanical
thrombectomy (MT) or intraarterial thrombolysis
(IAT) improve outcome as compared to no MT and/or
IVT? |
Since only data from case
reports are available, a specific recommendation on
MT or IAT in pregnant women cannot be made. |
All members suggest that pregnant women
with stroke and large vessel occlusion can be
treated with MT. |
A majority of members suggests that in
pregnant women MT alone should be preferred over IVT
or bridging therapy (IVT + ET). |
2.5. In women with acute
ischaemic stroke during postpartum period does
endovascular treatment improve outcome as compared
to no endovascular treatment and/or IVT? |
No data, case reports
available |
It is reasonably plausible that
postpartum women with stroke might benefit from
MT. |
Furthermore, a majority of members
suggests that is reasonably plausible to prefer MT
alone over IVT or bridging therapy (IVT + ET) |