Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;39(11):110952. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110952

Figure 4.

Figure 4

HLA restriction and epitope mapping for S811–831

(A) IFN-γ responses (ELISA) of 3 representative T cell clones with confirmed reactivity to S811–831 presented by partially HLA-matched APCs (LG2, 9068, MN605); Bar graphs: means ± standard deviations, with responses to S811–831 in black and DMSO control in gray.

(B) Antigen presentation blocking assays using T cell clones presented in A, and antibodies to DR, DQ, DP, and MHC class I. Inhibition indicated by colored arrows. Bar graphs: means ± standard deviations.

(C) Summary of T cell clone responses (clone number on top of graph) to S811–831; color scale represents the ΔOD450 (peptide-DMSO).

(D) Summary of blocking assay; color scale represents the percentage of inhibition.

(E) HLA alleles expressed by APCs shared with donors originating the T cell clones.

(F) Responses to a set of 11-mer peptides covering S811–831; bars: response (%) of each truncated peptide relative to the full-length peptide. Representative clones for different reactivity patterns are shown; clone number on top; number of clones exhibiting a similar pattern in parentheses. Minimal sequence required to explain reactivity is highlighted.

(G) Summary of the 2 partially overlapping patterns observed in 32 clones (boxed in blue for DQ and yellow for DP).

(H) Location of minimal epitopes from (F), shown aligned with S811–831 (color of lines match color of boxes; thickness of line represents approximate frequency of the pattern). Binding motifs for DQ5 and DP4 are shown as sequence logos.

(I) Normalized binding (half-maximal inhibitory concentration[IC50]-positive control/IC50 peptide) for truncated peptides to purified DQ5 or DP4 (see also Figures S2, S3 and S4).