Skip to main content
. 2022 May 26;7:58. doi: 10.1038/s41541-022-00480-2

Table 2.

Combination of anti-PfCSP and anti-PfTRAP can improve sterile protection from mosquito-bite challenge.

Sterile protectiona Exp 1 Sterile protectiona Exp 2 Sterile protectiona Exp 3 Sterile protectiona Combined Comparison p valueb vs. 150 µg mIgG Comparison p valueb vs. 50 µg αCSP
150 μg mIgGc 0/7 (0%)d 0/7 (0%)d 0/5 (0%) 0/19 (0%) <0.0001
50 μg AKBR-4 0/6 (0%) 0/5 (0%) 0/11 (0%) 1 0.0002
50 μg αCSP 5/7 (71%)d 5/8 (63%)d 5/8 (63%) 15/23 (65%) <0.0001
150 μg αCSP 3/5 (60%) 3/5 (60%) 0.002 0.88
50 μg AKBR-4 + 50 μg αCSP 6/7 (86%) 8/9 (89%) 14/16 (88%) <0.0001 0.131

aSterile protection: mice that remain parasite-free (via microscopic blood-smear monitoring) throughout the experimental time course.

bBarnard’s exact test p values shown were not adjusted for multiple comparisons due to small group sizes and a small number of predefined comparisons being made.

cmIgG: normal mouse IgG control

dindicates results previously reported in Kisalu et al.55.

Mice were injected with indicated doses of either nonspecific mIgG, anti-CSP mAb CIS43, anti-PfTRAP mAb AKBR-4, or a combination of anti-CSP and AKBR-4 24 h prior to challenge with five Pf-infected mosquitoes. Mice were injected with human red blood cells on days 5 and 6, and then blood was sampled on days 7 and 9 to detect blood-stage parasitemia by qRT-PCR. The number and percentages of mice protected across three independent experiments are shown.