Table 1.
The various routes for applying for ethical review procedures in an international internet-based mHealth intervention study.
Ethical approval needed? | Country | Contacted institute for ethical approval | REC contacted by | Comment on the ethical procedure needed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | NL | Medical Ethics Review Board at institute of researchers | Directly accessible by the researchers | Full review procedures were needed to recruit participants in the Netherlands. |
GER | National society | Application possible by a researcher, but needs to be in German | Full review procedure. | |
ESP | University REC | Application only possible involving a member of the university | Full review procedure. | |
UK | University REC | Application only possible involving a member of the university | Full review procedure. | |
No | USA | Governmental institute | The researchers directly contacted the institute | The governmental institute exempted this study from ethical approval. |
CAN | Governmental institute | The researchers directly contacted the institute | The study is not funded nor hosted in Canada, therefore Canadian national authorities do not need to review this study ethically. | |
AUS | University REC | The researchers directly contacted the university | The Research Ethics and Compliance department of the university stated that the ethical approval of the UMCG is sufficient and no further ethical procedures are needed. |
Note: REC = research ethics committee; NL = the Netherlands; GER = Germany; ESP = Spain; UK = the United Kingdom; USA = the United Stated of America; CAN = Canada; AUS = Australia.