Skip to main content
editorial
. 2021 Nov 26;28:100487. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100487

Table 1.

The various routes for applying for ethical review procedures in an international internet-based mHealth intervention study.

Ethical approval needed? Country Contacted institute for ethical approval REC contacted by Comment on the ethical procedure needed
Yes NL Medical Ethics Review Board at institute of researchers Directly accessible by the researchers Full review procedures were needed to recruit participants in the Netherlands.
GER National society Application possible by a researcher, but needs to be in German Full review procedure.
ESP University REC Application only possible involving a member of the university Full review procedure.
UK University REC Application only possible involving a member of the university Full review procedure.
No USA Governmental institute The researchers directly contacted the institute The governmental institute exempted this study from ethical approval.
CAN Governmental institute The researchers directly contacted the institute The study is not funded nor hosted in Canada, therefore Canadian national authorities do not need to review this study ethically.
AUS University REC The researchers directly contacted the university The Research Ethics and Compliance department of the university stated that the ethical approval of the UMCG is sufficient and no further ethical procedures are needed.

Note: REC = research ethics committee; NL = the Netherlands; GER = Germany; ESP = Spain; UK = the United Kingdom; USA = the United Stated of America; CAN = Canada; AUS = Australia.