Skip to main content
. 2022 May 13;13:811768. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.811768

TABLE 3.

Comparison between the performance of the ERA/CRISPR–Cas12a dual system and commercial qPCR kit.

ERA/CRISPR–Cas12 Fluorescence System
ERA/CRISPR–Cas12 Dipstick System
Total (n = 92)
Positive Negative Positive Negative
Positive 56 0 52 4 56
Negative 0 36 0 36 36
PPA/NPA PPA: 100% NPA: 100% PPA: 92.86% NPA: 100%

Data were presented as the number of specimens.