Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 20;8(5):581–589. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.2c00004

Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa.

1.

      yield (%)
entry [M] cat. ligand (mol %) 4aab 5aab 6aab
1 Rh2(Oct)4 74 31 0
2 Rh2(Oct)4 BINAP (1.5) 75 26 3
3 Rh2(Oct)4 Xantphos (1.5) 76 7 18
4 Rh2(Oct)4 dppb (1.5) 86 0 5
5 Rh2(Oct)4 PPh3 (3.0) 86 8 0
6 Rh2(Oct)4 iPr-NHCc (3.0) 53 4 15
7 Rh2(TPA)4 Xantphos (1.5) 91 0 12
8 Rh2(OPiv)4 Xantphos(1.5) 42 0 85
9 CuCl Xantphos (1.5) 27 0 0
10 [Pd(PhCN)2Cl2] Xantphos (1.5) 99 0 0
11 Rh(COD)2BF4 Xantphos (1.5) 99 0 0
12 Xantphos (1.5) 0 0 0
a

1a (0.375 mmol, 1.5 equiv), 2a (0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 3 (0.75 mmol, 3.0 equiv), MeCN (2.0 mL), [M] catalyst (1.0 mol %), ligand (1.5 mol %), Cs2CO3 (3.5 equiv), 60 °C, 6.0 h.

b

GC yields. Yields for 4aa were calculated based on 1a as the limiting substrate. Yields for 5aa and 6aa were calculated based on 2a as the limiting substrate.

c

iPr-NHC = 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazolium chloride.