Skip to main content
. 2022 May 20;9(5):223. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9050223

Table 2.

Bioengineering methods of growth factor delivery, examples, advantages, and disadvantages.

Method Examples Advantages Disadvantages Ref.
Scaffolds Polymers:
synthetic, natural, mixed, plasma coated
  • Mechanical stability

  • Easy to fabricate

  • Natural polymers: low mechanical stability.

[46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70]
Ceramic
Bioinert: zirconia and alumina,
Bioactive: Bioactive glass, Hydroxyapatite, glass
  • Biodegradable

  • Biocompatible

  • Bioinert ceramics exhibit Hydrothermal aging

  • Brittle

[43,44,45]
Metal-based scaffolds
Titanium, Zirconium, Platinum, stainless steel
  • High Young’s modulus

  • Enhanced compressive strength

  • Ion release

  • Non-degradable

[41,42]
Encapsulation Physical encapsulation:
Phase emulsion, freeze-drying solvent casting, gas foaming
  • Maintained bioactivity

  • Rapid burst release

[62,63]
Microparticles
Synthetic polymers MPs: PLGA
  • High surface to volume ratio

  • High drug loading ability

  • Difficult to control the degradation rate

[64,65,66]
Nanoparticles:
BMP-7 loaded NPs
  • Controlled release

  • Enhance mechanical strength

  • Unstable in nature

[67,68,69,70]
Layer-by-layer
Assembly
3-D bioprinting
  • Retains growth factor functions

  • High tensile strength

  • Low loading capacity

  • Bone overgrowth

[71,72,73,74]
Hydrogel HA hydrogel, Collagen, Chitosan, Alginate
  • Site-specific release

  • Low tensile strength

[75,76,77,78,79]