Skip to main content
. 2022 May 10;11(5):937. doi: 10.3390/antiox11050937

Table 2.

Effect of dietary curcumin (CUR) on the growth performance of O. niloticus.

IBW
(g/fish)
FBW
(g/fish)
ADWG (g/fish) TWG (g/fish) TFI (g/fish) FCR PER PPE SGR
CUR0 41.8 81.2 b 0.56 b 39 b 51 1.30 ab 2.2 1.2 0.95 b
CUR200 41.8 93.4 a 0.74 a 51.5 a 64.7 1.26 ab 2.2 1.2 1.15 a
CUR400 41.3 96 a 0.78 a 54.7 a 60 1.10 b 2.3 1.3 1.20 a
CUR600 41.4 81.7 b 0.58 b 40 b 51.5 1.28 ab 2.2 1.2 0.97 b
CUR800 41.4 83 b 0.59 b 41.5 b 58.7 1.41 a 2 1.1 0.99 b
SEM 1.46 2.18 0.03 2.18 1.95 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03
Linear Reg. # 0.14 0.18 0.22 0.22 0.80 0.16 0.31 0.53 0.32
Quadratic Reg. # 0.51 ≤0.01 ≤0.01 ≤0.01 0.14 ≤0.01 0.13 0.12 ≤0.01

# The regressions were considered significant at p < 0.05. IBW, initial body weight; FBW, final body weight; ADWG, average daily weight gain; TWG, total body weight gain; TFI, total feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio; PER, protein efficiency ratio; PPE, protein productive efficiency; SGR, specific growth rate. Variation in the data was expressed as pooled SEM. a,b Mean values in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). CUR0, CUR200, CUR400, CUR600, and CUR800: basal diets supplemented with 0, 200, 400, 600, or 800 mg curcumin/kg diet, respectively.