Table 2.
×109 | LA | LV | PV | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
corresponding abundance | AC1 * | 53,200.08 ± 78,097.71 | (7) | 340,281.06 ± 402,755.99 | (5) | 876,466.31 ±1,272,990.19 | (6) |
AC2 # | 1.95 ± 2.79 | (6) | 3.38 ± 3.79 | (3) | 3.52 ± 4.59 | (5) | |
AC3 $ | 80,931.17 ±126,819.78 | (6) | 46,348.88 ± 57,065.14 | (5) | 150,449.16 ± 301,138.14 | (6) | |
AC4 † | 20.37 ±28.00 | (6) | 9.43 ± 8.09 | (4) | 12.32 ± 12.63 | (5) | |
AC5 & | 1,451,129.43 ±3,541,141.54 | (8) | 408,442.32 ± 785,280.03 | (5) | 536,885.37 ± 661,839.27 | (5) | |
AC6 | 549.27 ±730.34 | (8) | 417.79 ± 681.51 | (5) | 810.37 ± 1038.31 | (5) | |
AC7 | 4051.16 ± 6371.10 | (7) | 393.87 ± 725.97 | (5) | 29,443.41 ± 39,503.56 | (5) | |
AC8 | 130.21 ± 168.44 | (5) | 35.74 ± 67.52 | (5) | 167.89 ± 205.04 | (5) |
* p < 0.0001, vs. AC2; p < 0.0001, vs. AC4; p = 0.0029, vs. AC6; p = 0.0026, vs. AC7; p < 0.0001, vs. AC8. # p = 0.0002, vs. AC3; p < 0.0001, vs. AC5. $ p = 0.0011, vs. AC4; p = 0.0048, vs. AC8. † p < 0.0001, vs. AC5. & p = 0.0014, vs. AC6; p = 0.0012, vs. AC7; p < 0.0001, vs. AC8.