Skip to main content
. 2022 May 20;12(5):355. doi: 10.3390/bios12050355

Table 2.

The mean, standard deviation, and confidence interval (90% CI) of detection rate, coincidence, and precision of the proposed algorithm on the acquired signal of Experiment 1. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Position TP FN FP DR (%) p-Value CO (%) p-Value P+ (%) p-Value
Ch1
Chest
Proposed method 159 0 9 100.0 ± 0
[100.0 100.0]
0.18 96.4 ± 1.2
[95.6 97.2]
*** 94.2 ± 5.0
[91.9 97.9]
***
With iSKNA [12] 157 2 103 98.8 ± 2.6
[97.2 100.2]
92.2 ± 1.7
[91.4 92.8]
59.9 ± 3.6
[58.2 62.4]
Ch2
Biceps
Proposed method 111 3 18 96.4 ± 5.5
[95.6 99.3]
* 92.3 ± 2.1
[91.6 92.9]
*** 87.3 ± 7.4
[85.3 89.4]
***
With iSKNA [12] 100 14 47 87.1 ± 11.0
[84.5 92.5]
87.6 ± 2.4
[87.0 88.6]
67.6 ± 9.3
[63.9 70.5]
Ch3
Forearm
Proposed method 147 2 10 98.7 ± 3.2
[97.0 100.3]
0.34 94.2 ± 1.3
[93.3 94.9]
*** 93.7 ± 2.6
[92.3 95.4]
***
With iSKNA [12] 146 3 94 97.8 ± 5.8
[94.2 101.0]
91.0 ± 0.9
[90.5 91.5]
60.5 ± 5.8
[57.1 63.8]
Summary Proposed method 417 4 46 98.2 ± 3.9
[97.7 99.6]
** 94.3 ± 2.3
[93.6 95.0]
*** 91.8 ± 6.2
[89.9 93.9]
***
With iSKNA [12] 403 18 244 94.5 ± 8.9
[91.7 97.2]
90.3 ± 2.6
[89.5 91.0]
62.8 ± 7.3
[60.4 65.0]