Table 5.
Scaffold Types | Preparation Methods | Results | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Chitosan-Based Scaffolds | |||
CH films | Casting method to form films; Adsorption of protein sol. on CH films (4 °C, overnight). |
CH films: FI/SMCs is less spread and more elongated; CH/AP: modest VECs growth, altered elongated morphology, low spreading; CH/COL IV composites: enhanced VECs growth, superior cell morphology. |
[164] |
CH/AP | |||
CH/COL composites | |||
(bFGF-CH-P4HB)/DPAV hybrid scaffolds | Coating DPAV with bFGF-CH-P4HB by electrospinning technique (20 kV, room temp.) | bFGF-CH-P4HB fibers form membranes with uniform thickness, firmly attached on DPAV surface; bFGF has a positive effect on the MSCs proliferation. |
[165] |
CH/BP scaffolds |
Immersion of BP tissues in CH/H2CO3 sol. (pH 3, 2 h, 30 MPa, room temp.) | CH/BP are less rigid and the risk factor of fatigue failureis reduced; Calcification and bacterial strains adhesion are attenuated; In vivo: no inflammatory reaction, after 4 months of implantation in rats. |
[166] |
CH-PU-GEL nanofibrous scaffolds |
Electrospinning technique (16 to 20 kV, room temp.) |
OCAs adhered preferentially on CH-GEL-PU, are flattened, spread across the surface and have cobblestone morphology; able to withstand shear-stresses ranging from 0.062 to 0.185 N/m2 for up to 3 h; | [167] |
CH fibers with immobilized HEP | Extrusion method; HEP immobilization with EDC |
Crosslinking degree influences fiber diameters, strength and stiffness; CH-HEP promotes VIC attachment and growth (cell viability ~ 95%, 10 days). | [168] |
CH-PCL/DBP biohybrid scaffolds | Electrospinning technique (27–32 °C, 15 kV) |
hVICs viability on CH-PCL/DBP (A&R) ~ 90%; Biohybrid (A) has better uniaxial mechanical properties and higher alignment of hVICs compared to a randomly electrospun sample (B). |
[169] |
Hyaluronic Acid-Based Scaffolds | |||
Me-HA, Me-HA/PEG-DA hydrogels | Photopolymerization (UV light, 5 mW/cm2, 3 min, photoinitiator) |
Degradation rate: Me-HA/PEG-DA—1 week; Me-HA—2 days; VICs remain viable following photopolymerization; high proliferation after exposure to LMW HA degradation products. |
[170] |
(Me-HA+CD34)/Me-Gel hydrogels |
Photopolymerization (UV light, 180 s, 5.5 mW/cm2); CD34 immobilization by EDC/NHS. | Increasing CD34 conc. increases EPC attachment (25.3 ± 5.3 EPCs/mm2 at 10 μg/mL; 52.2 ± 5.0 EPCs/mm2 at 25 μg/mL); (Me-HA+CD34)/Me-Gel promoted cell elongationand higher spreading. |
[171] |
SilylHA-CTA/LLDPE IPNs | Silylation of HA-CTA; LLDPE films swollen in silylHA-CTA/xylene (50 °C/1 h). |
HA/LLDPE exhibit lower contact angles and less blood clotting than LLDPE alone, which led to considerable thrombus formation; PHVs showed acceptable values for RF (4.77 ± 0.42%) and EOA (2.34 ± 0.5 cm2). | [172,173] |
HA-LLDPE IPNs/CoCr-MP35N stent | Swelling process was used to obtain IPNs; fixing by PP sutures on the stent frame. | Hemodynamic parameters (EOA, RF, PI) have values comparable with those of commercial transcatheter valves; Turbulent flow tests show a decrease of RSS at each cardiac phase. |
[174] |
Me-HA/Me-Gel MOHA/Me-Gel hybridhydrogels |
Molding technique and exposure to UV light (2 mW/cm2; 5 min) |
Me-Gel stimulates VICs spread and migration from spheroids; Cell circularity was much lower in low stiffness hydrogels than in stiffer ones; VICs have a spindle-like morphology only in hydrogels with Me-Gel. |
[175] |
Me-HA/Me-Gel/PGS-PCL hybrid hydrogels |
Immersion of electrospun PGS-PCL into hydrogel; Photocrosslinking (UV light, 45 s, 2.6 mW/cm2). |
MVICs have an initial rounded shape and low spread; MVICs are predominantly spread over the surface of PGS-PCL fibers only; 21 days: MVICs spread is complete into hybrid hydrogels, with non-homogenous distribution at different depths. |
[176] |
Cellulose-Based Scaffolds | |||
CA coatings for metallic valves |
Electrospinning technique; Surface functionalization with RGD and YIGSRG |
CA coatings promote cardiac cell growth on valve surface; CA ensures the control of endothelialization and reduction of thrombosis. |
[12] |
CNF/PU films nanocomposites |
Film-stacking method; Compression molding |
Prosthetic valves have good biological durability, fatigue resistance and hemodynamics properties; no failure is registered after accelerated fatigue tests, equivalent of 12-year cycles. |
[177] |
mNG composite hydrogels | Covalent conjugation of mNCC on Me-Gel backbone via NHS/EDC crosslinking |
Encapsulated HADMSCs on mNG displayed phenotypic properties found within the heart valve spongiosa; lower expression of osteogenic genes indicates resistance toward calcification. |
[178] |
BC/PVA anisotropic nanocomposites |
Physical crosslinking by freeze-thaw cycles (20 °C/−20 °C); molding technique |
Mechanical properties are similar to valve leaflet tissues, in both principal directions; the composition and number of freeze-thaw cycles substantially influence the tissue properties. | [179,180] |
Thermal processing; molding technique |
Trileaflet mechanical heart valve mimics the non-linear mechanical properties and anisotropic behavior of the porcine heart valves. | [181,182] | |
Alginate-Based Scaffolds | |||
PEG-DA/Alg hydrogels |
Simultaneous 3D printing/photocrosslink ingmethods | The scaffolds with 10% Alg allow PAVICs to grow along the conduits surface, but less on the root and leaflet interstitium; high cell viability: 91.3 ± 10.7% (day 1) and 100% (day 7 and 21). |
[137] |
Alg/GEL hydrogels |
3D bioprinting with mold extrusion technique |
Printing accuracy: 84.3 ± 10.9%; Cell viability (7 days): 81.4 ± 3.4% (SMCs); 83.2 ± 4.0% (VICs); SMCs express α-SMA in stiff matrix; VICs express VIM in soft matrix. |
[133] |
Dop-Alg hydrogel coatings |
Covalent bonding of Dop to Alg (EDC/NHS route); Crosslinking with GA |
In vitro: only Dop-Alg determines a decrease in the Ca content: 2.919 ± 0.252 mg/L—day 3; 0.725 ± 0.012 mg/L—day 6; In vivo: the largest decrease in Ca content for Dop-Alg: 1.737 ± 0.124 mg/L—day 20; 0.675 ± 0.084 mg/L—day 30. |
[183] |
Abbreviations: A&R—aligned and random; ACAN—aggrecan; Alg—alginate; AP—adhesive proteins; BC—bacterial cellulose; bFGF—basic fibroblast growth factor; BP—bovine pericardium; CD34—mouse antibody; Ca—calcium; CA—cellulose acetate; CH—chitosan; CNF—cellulose nanofibrils; COL IV—collagen type IV; CTA—cetyltrimethylammonium bromide; DBP—decellularized bovine pericardium; Dop—dopamine; DPAV—decellularized porcine aortic valve; EC—endothelial cells; EDC—1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide; EOA—effective orifice area; EPC—endothelial progenitor cells; FI—fibroblast; Gel—gelatin; GA—glutaraldehyde; HADMSCs—Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells; HEP—heparin; IPNs—interpenetrated networks; Me-GEL—methacrylated gelatin; Me-HA—methacrylated HA; mNG—mNCC—TEMPO-modified nanocrystalline cellulose; MOHA—methacrylated oxidized HA; MSCs—mesenchymal stem cells; MVICs—mitral valve interstitial cells; NHS—N-hydroxysuccinimide; OCAs—ovine carotid arteries cells; P4HB—poly-4-hydroxybutyrate; PAVICs—porcine aorta valve interstitial cells; PCL—polycaprolactone; PEG-DA—poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate; PGS-PCL—poly(glycerol sebacate)-polycaprolactone; PHA—polyhydroxyalkanoates; PHVs—polymeric heart valves; PI—pinwheeling index; PP—polypropylene; PU—polyurethane; PVA—poly(vinyl alcohol); RF—regurgitant fraction; RGD—Arginine-Glycine-Aspartate peptides; RSS—Reynolds Shear Stress; SilylHA—silylated HA; α-SMA—α-smooth muscle actin; SMCs—smooth muscle cells; TCPS—tissue culture polystyrene; VICs—valvular interstitial cells; VIM—vimentin; YIGSRG—tyrosine-isoleucine-glycine-serine-arginine-glycine malinins.