Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;20(5):e3001633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001633

Fig 4. Inference with WF model from chemostat dynamics.

Fig 4

The figure shows results of inference using NPE and either the WF or chemostat (Chemo) model on 5 simulated synthetic observations generated using the chemostat model for different combinations of fitness effect sC and formation rate δC. Boxplots and markers show the log ratio of MAP estimate to true parameters for sC and δC. Horizontal solid line represents a log ratio of zero, indicating an accurate MAP estimate; dotted lines indicate an order of magnitude difference between the MAP estimate and the true parameter. Data and code required to generate this figure can be found at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/E9D5X. MAP, maximum a posteriori; NPE, Neural Posterior Estimation; WF, Wright–Fisher.