Skip to main content
. 2022 May 12;23(10):5405. doi: 10.3390/ijms23105405

Table 2.

Cellulose-based materials for wound dressing.

Materials Fabrication Cellulose Source Form Study Closure (%) Time (days) Bacteria Efficiency Ref.
BC–CTS Immersing BC in chitosan followed by freeze-drying Acetobacter xylinum Membrane In vivo 85 8 E. coli
S. aureus
99.9% [227]
Cellulose nanofibrils Filtration technique Birch pulp fibers Membrane In vitro
In vivo
Clinical studies
8–9 P. aeruginosa,
S. aureus
None [53]
Carboxylated CNF 1. Autoclaved using NaOH
2. TEMPO-mediated oxidation
Pinus radiata bleached kraft pulp fibers Gels In vitro
In vivo
24 h 60% [87]
SSD/BC Impregnation of BC with SSD via ultrasonication Commercial membrane Membrane In vitro P. aeruginosa,
E. coli,
S. aureus
6.5 mm [214]
BC Cultured bacteria in Hestrin and Schramm (HS) Acetobacter xylinum Film In vitro
In vivo
90 24 h [220]
T-GNF 1. Alkali treatment
2. TEMPO-mediated oxidation
Ginger fibers Hydrogels In vitro 67 72 h E. coli, S. aureus 0 [221]
BACNF/QCR 1. Cation exchange
2. Freeze-drying
Brown algae Sponge In vitro
In vivo
100 12 d 6 mm [228]