Skip to main content
. 2022 May 12;23(10):5412. doi: 10.3390/ijms23105412

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Content of the cyclophilin family in the four tomato cultivars in both control (CTRL) and drought-stressed (DS) samples. (A) Immunoblot analysis of cyclophilin with the three bands identified at 25, 23, and 15 kDa. Lane 1, Perina CTRL; lane 2, Perina DS; lane 3 Fragola CTRL; lane 4, Fragola DS; lane 5, Quarantino CTRL; lane 6 Quarantino DS; lane 7, Pisanello CTRL; lane 8, Pisanello DS. (B) Quantitative analysis of the relative content of the three cyclophilin bands in the different samples. In green the control samples, in red the stressed samples.