Table 2.
Comparison of other reported methods for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein analysis.
| Methods | linear rang | LOD | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon magnetic beads-based electrochemical immunosensor | 40 ng·mL−1–10 μg·mL−1 | 14 ng·mL−1 | [15] |
| Nanozyme-based chemiluminescence immunoassay | 0.2 ng·mL−1–100 ng·mL−1 | 0.1 ng·mL−1 | [16] |
| Fiber-optic label-free biosensor | 1 pg·mL−1–100 μg·mL−1 | _ | [17] |
| Field-effect transistor-based electrical immunosensor | _ | 100 fg·mL−1 | [18] |
| Aptamer binding-induced multiple hairpin assembly-based electrochemical aptasensor | 50 fg mL−1∼ 50 ng mL−1 | 9.79 fg mL−1 | This work |