Skip to main content
. 2022 May 28;248:123605. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123605

Table 2.

Comparison of other reported methods for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein analysis.

Methods linear rang LOD Ref.
Carbon magnetic beads-based electrochemical immunosensor 40 ng·mL−1–10 μg·mL−1 14 ng·mL−1 [15]
Nanozyme-based chemiluminescence immunoassay 0.2 ng·mL−1–100 ng·mL−1 0.1 ng·mL−1 [16]
Fiber-optic label-free biosensor 1 pg·mL−1–100 μg·mL−1 _ [17]
Field-effect transistor-based electrical immunosensor _ 100 fg·mL−1 [18]
Aptamer binding-induced multiple hairpin assembly-based electrochemical aptasensor 50 fg mL−1∼ 50 ng mL−1 9.79 fg mL−1 This work