Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 18;31(5):781–793. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01718-5

Table 1.

Socio economic characteristics of the three staging groups

Stage 1 group n = 75 (74a) Stage 2 group n = 396 Stage 3 group n = 52
Sex, female, n (%) 34 (45) 190 (48) 21 (40)
Age, years, mean (SD) 10.1 (0.30) 10.2 (0.12) 10.2 (0.40)
1st or 2nd generation immigrant, n (%) NA 5 (1) NA
Mother’s highest education, n (%) +
 Lower secondary 5 (7) 27 (7) 10 (19)
 Upper secondary 30 (41) 152 (41) 18 (35)
 Short cycle tertiary, Bachelor or equivalent 33 (45) 186 (48) 20 (38)
 Master or equivalent 6 (8) 25 (6) 4 (8)
Father’s highest education, n (%) *
 Lower secondary 8 (13) 53 (15) 9 (19)
 Upper secondary 41 (64) 178 (49) 19 (40)
 Short cycle tertiary, Bachelor or equivalent 10 (15) 91 (25) 18 (38)
 Master or equivalent 5 (8) 38 (11) NA
No. of children in household, n (%) $
 1 24 (32) 67 (17) 6 (12)
 2 30 (41) 235 (59) 30 (58)
 3 +  20 (27) 94 (24) 16 (31)
Household type, n (%)
 Single woman 15 (20) 90 (23) 15 (29)
 Couple 47 (64) 276 (70) 32 (62)
 Other constellations (single male or more than one family) 12 (16) 30 (8) 5 (10)
Household income before tax, n (%)
 0–500,000 DKK 24 (32) 112 (28) 21 (40)
  > 500,000–1,000,000 DKK 40 (54) 235 (59) 23 (44)
  > 1,000,000 DKK 10 (14) 49 (12) 8 (15)

aOne child is not identifiable in the national register, hence only sex and age were available. NA Not applicable due to the combination of low number and data confidentiality

*Group 1 is statistically significant different from group 3 on a P-level < 0.05

+Group 2 is statistically significant different from group 3 on a P-level < 0.05

$Group 1 is statistically significant different from group 2 and 3 on a P-level < 0.05