Skip to main content
. 1999 Jul;65(7):2877–2894. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.7.2877-2894.1999

TABLE 1.

Reference values for parameters used for comparative analysis of the effects of cell preparation protocols on cell surface propertiesa

Organism Electrophoretic mobility (μm-cm/Vs) Viabilityb (%) Hydrophobicityc (%) Attachment (103 cells/cm2) to:
% Retention on Sepharose columns
Stainless steel Aluminum Perspex Polypropylene Sepharose Phenyl-Sepharose Octyl-Sepharose DEAE-Sepharose Carboxymethyl-Sepharose
Carbon-limited strain SW8 −0.38 ± 0.01 85.4 ± 3.8 92.8 ± 1.9 5.2 ± 1.2 6.9 ± 2.4 2.0 ± 0.7 3.1 ± 0.9 57.4 ± 5.8 60.7 ± 7.7 80.6 ± 1.9 100 19.1 ± 3.3
Nitrogen-limited strain SW8 −0.51 ± 0.01 94.4 ± 3.8 92.2 ± 4.6 3.1 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 1.0 1.7 ± 0.6 1.2 ± 0.5 24.7 ± 1.6 41.9 ± 0.7 94.7 ± 0.6 100 22.6 ± 3.1
E. coli −3.33 ± 0.01 89.1 ± 3.7 77.6 ± 7.5 5.9 ± 2.2 7.5 ± 2.0 7.9 ± 1.6 0.9 ± 0.6 42.8 ± 2.3 45.3 ± 3.7 39.4 ± 1.0 91.3 ± 1.8 53.7 ± 5.1
S. epidermidis −1.04 ± 0.01 92.4 ± 3.8 91.3 ± 1.6 4.2 ± 1.2 8.2 ± 1.3 3.3 ± 1.1 0.4 ± 0.2 20.0 ± 2.7 26.3 ± 1.7 36.3 ± 2.1 97.7 ± 0.2 14.8 ± 2.3
a

Cells were centrifuged at 5,000 × g and then washed and resuspended in buffered solutions containing NaCl. 

b

Percent viability [(number of CFU on nutrient agar)/(total number of cells)] × 100. 

c

Percent hydrophobicity (MATH assay) = [(final optical density of the aqueous phase)/(optical density of the initial suspension prior to mixing with dodecane)] × 100.