Skip to main content
. 1999 Jul;65(7):2877–2894. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.7.2877-2894.1999

TABLE 5.

Impact of modification of the resuspension medium on viability, electrophoretic mobility, and hydrophobicity of test organisms subjected to different cell preparation protocols

Organism Treatment % of reference value
Viability
Electrophoretic mobility
Hydrophobicity
NaCl/H2O
(NaCl/NaCl)a
H2O/H2O
(H2O/NaCl)
NaCl/H2O
(NaCl/NaCl)
H2O/H2O
(H2O/NaCl)
NaCl/H2O
(NaCl/NaCl)
H2O/H2O
(H2O/NaCl)
Carbon-limited strain SW8 5,000 × gb 100 100 271 240  86  74
15,000 × gc 100 100 246 210  24  69
Freeze-drying d 100 d 0 d  17
Air drying 100 100 281 270  82 100
MATH 100 100 45 38
Nitrogen-limited strain SW8 5,000 × gb 100 100 490 490  73  88
15,000 × gc 100 100 460 458  14  75
Freeze-drying d 100 d −108e d  17
Air drying 100 100 276 236  88 100
MATH 100 100 9 32
E. coli 5,000 × gb 100  87 145 564  50  66
15,000 × gc 100 100 708 375  58  38
Freeze-drying d 100 d 478 d 100
Air drying 100 100 418 521  16  0
MATH  55 100 505 151
S. epidermidis 5,000 × gb 100 100 435 328  93 100
15,000 × gc 100 100 1,362 672 100 100
Freeze-drying d 100 d d d d
Air drying 100 100 5 88  91 100
MATH  83 100 9 177
a

Washing medium/resuspension medium (washing medium/resuspension medium with which the reference value was obtained). 

b

Centrifugation at 5,000 × g

c

Centrifugation at 15,000 × g

d

The bacterial cells used for XPS analysis were not washed in the NaCl solution. 

e

Reversal of the electrophoretic mobility sign resulted in a reduction in the value.