Skip to main content
. 2022 May 11;14(10):1963. doi: 10.3390/polym14101963

Table 1.

The packaging performance of cellulose materials vs petroleum-based alternatives.

Molded Pulp Foam Formed
Cellulose Materials
Corrugated Board Plastic Foams (eps)
Material Wood/plant cellulose fibers/recycled fibers/waste Wood/plant cellulose fibers/recycled fibers/waste Wood/plant cellulose fibers/recycled fibers Petroleum based
Sustainability Recyclable/biodegradable/
compostable
Recyclable/biodegradable/
compostable
Recyclable/biodegradable/compostable Non-biodegradable
Non-recyclable
Release toxic gas when burning [1,4]
Cushioning performance Excellent vibration and cushioning properties
Limited to package of products with low weight and volume [1,4]
Excellent vibration and cushioning properties Inconsistent vibration and cushioning properties
Not sufficiently soft [1,4]
Good vibration and cushioning properties
Shipping and storage Easily nests [4] Easily nests [4] Require labor and assembly Does not nest [4]
Climate tolerance Is not affected by extreme external conditions Not affected by extreme temperature
Moisture proof by use of hydrophobic cellulose fibers [5,6]
Humidity affects
performances
Temperature
affects brittleness [4]
Durability and mechanical strength Good Can be improved by refining of cellulose fibers [7], using of strength additives [8] and surfactant type [9] Good High mechanical; strength and durability
Price High Low Low High